Inconceivable

Inconceivable

We just realized that it’s been over two years now since my husband’s penis has been inside me. His tongue work is amazing and he has been doing a wonderful job keeping my penetrative needs met with his strapon head harness, while his own penis remains locked away in it’s chastity cage.

Now as I get older, I don’t crave penetration as much anymore. But for the times I do, his head harness dildo is bigger and shaped better for my pleasure than his real penis, and I am used to feeling the bigger size now.

Being constantly locked in chastity, his cock is protected from rubbing and chafing, keeping it quite sensitive when touched. This assures premature ejaculation is inevitable. He gets so excited and I barely get it out of it’s cage before he warns me that he is about to cum.

While it’s very flattering to know I’m so sexy to him that he simply can’t control himself, it also renders his cock completely useless for penetration. As I plan on keeping him this way in the foreseeable future, he may never be able to effectively enter me again. I wonder if this happens to other guys locked in chastity in their FLR relationships. Now, even if he could penetrate me and last longer, I’m enjoying denying him so much that I simply prefer not to allow it anymore.

We still have plenty of sexy times together and I make sure he feels very loved and wanted, but his penis gets no attention at all while he concentrates all his attention on pleasuring me. Recently I’ve become fascinated by the thought of women rejecting male penetration. While plenty of women really enjoy and even orgasm from PIV (penis in vagina) sex, others can have various reasons for forbidding the man in her life to be inside her.

She may have Vaginismus or other problems that make it painful for her. Guys, would you remain PIV free to keep from hurting her? I know my husband would if this was what I needed as we have talked about it.

She may be asexual or feel revulsion and dry up at the thought of penetration from an inferior submissive male but enjoy all the other benefits of being with one. Some people engage in female led relationships that focus on service only, which remain platonic.

She may wish to keep him a virgin forever. As a fierce mommy domme, the thought of keeping a man pure and innocent is appealing to me. As it is, I love knowing I’m the only woman my husband has ever been sexual with, but if I could go back in time and he agreed to it, I would seriously consider keeping him a virgin forever. When the time came to have children, I may have allowed it enough to conceive a child, or I could have collected some of his sperm and inseminated myself with it.

Obviously this wouldn’t apply to cuckolding relationships, but if she is monogamous, she may wish to forgo using birth control. This is so important that I’m surprised this isn’t often brought up in female led relationships and should be seriously considered, especially for those into the male chastity lifestyle. It’s supposed to be all about her and her pleasure right? She doesn’t have to be on birth control if penetration never occurs. Side effects of birth control can be horrible for some women while others experience diminished libidos from taking the pill, just so he can enjoy penetration. A lot of women don’t achieve orgasm from PIV anyway so if she isn’t trying to get pregnant, what’s the point of it for her? Guys, is her health and happiness important enough for you to forgo penetration so that she can avoid the pill?

Submissive men, would it be inconceivable for you to be in a long term female led relationship where PIV sex is completely off the table? If she still gave you sexual pleasure and used you in other ways for her sexual needs, would you marry her with the full knowledge that you would never again be allowed to experience penetrative sex in your lifetime?

Ladies, if he agreed to try it, would you want to forgo PIV sex to get off birth control?