Dive Deep into Creativity: Discover, Share, Inspire
Just some random thoughts I had while reading the book:
1. Solnit was so pissed with the so-called everlasting knowledge that the men try to represent they have. Literally in every matter, they try to put forward some illogical, unreasonable and irrelevant garbage of the theories they posses and try to stop the women, violating the rights to speak laws everyday.
2. It has become a necessity to start talking about women and their rights by stating about their unprivileged condition first. Many people may find this as cliché or rather boring, but just think about it in this way, we guys might have become bored to hear about these regular women tragedy everyday where this shitty condition of women is not changing for these whole periods of times those had finally made you bored!
3. I loved how Solnit talked about the violence women are facing in her country as well as tried to talk about some of the problems of India. Some of her quotations are very very strong. She has a great political as well as philosophical views. She wasn't confined in talking about feminisms and women's problems only but also shared her perspectives as a writer in different artistic values.
4. In one of her essays, she also mentioned that time is definitely changing though. Women are suffering true, but not as much as they used to in the past. I think writing this is definitely an example of optimism which again gives us hope (the famous Pandora's box's hope in the good sense you know). The essay called "Pandora's box and volunteer police force" and "Thinking out of the box" are my absolute favorite.
5. In her essays she also talked about some other issues like capitalism etc. which shows her other sides like unbiases.
1 like for me to write an essay about Ted Lasso Season 3 Episode 6: Sunflowers.
「疵あと」 佐田稲子
"A wound" by Ineko Sada
「それは、その場に立ったことのない人間の考えね。自分が同じ目にあってそれがわかるの。そしてやっぱり、男の目ね。女って、なんて、口惜しいんでしょう」
« That is the idea of those who have never gone through it. You can understand that when you experience it. And yes, after all, that's how men see things. Oh how frustrating being a woman is. »
The movie adaptation of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has too many differences not to be considered its own work. There are many differences between the movie and the book, including major plot points not being explained and missing characters, there is also no preface. The preface gives an intro to the characters and the book's plot without it the reason for why Victor is after the monster is lost.
This is a quote from Frankenstein to Walton, who just found him out in the Arctic; they were looking for a trade route and stumbled upon him. “You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did; and I ardently hope that the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you, as mine has been.”(Shelly pg. 13)
{preface claim} Arguably, Walton is one of the most important parts of the story, offering the intro and how we first see Victor as a person and a creator. All of this leads into the story and how it is set up. In the movie, there isn’t a single explanation of what is going on or any kind of introduction at all; it opens with them watching a funeral (like creeps, I might add) and snatching the After the letters and meeting Walton, Victor starts to tell his story “I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body. For this, I had deprived myself of rest and health." (Shelly pg.35)
This quote shows how ambitious Victor is. In the movie, however, it doesn’t explain why he makes his monster or show just how much effort he puts into it. With no explanation, there can be no characterization of Victor or any humanity applied to his reasons. After making his monster he abandons the Monster almost immediately “Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room” (Shelly pg. 35) this quote shows the man's blatant disgust with the work he created; this is something that the movie both represents and dose so unwell in the movie while it is there in the way “Henry” (they changed his name from Victor for some odd reason) speaks and acts but it comes off more as fear that a creator has for his creation this is a difference form the book to the movie. In the book, it is more disgust and horror at himself and the monster than the act itself and he deeply regrets it, However, in the movie it is fear of the monster and the act not at himself and what he has done.
There are also other characters who either have changed or simply do not exist altogether in the movie that should have been there. A while later after the monster has run away Victor gets a letter from his father that his brother is dead (I say a while because it is not explicitly stated). “About five in the morning I discovered my lovely boy, whom the night before I had seen blooming and active in health, stretched on the grass livid and motionless: the print of the murder’s finger was on his neck” (Shelly pg. 47) the murder of his brother is what spurs victor into going back to Geneva and finding the monster he says “the filthy daemon to whom I had given life. What did he do there? Could he be the murderer of my brother? No sooner had the imagination, than I became convinced of its truth” (Shelly pg.50)
Seeing the monster at his brother's Funeral spurs him to go after the monster to find him. This character's death is Victor's motivation to find the monster and talk with him or kill him to find out what he wanted or why he murdered Victor's brother. But in the movie, his brother doesn’t exist, so he loses that motivation that would normally be there.
The last and probably most important thing that is different from the book to the movie is that the monster is completely different in both the book and the film. Shortly after Victor finds the monster begins to tell his story “I began also to observe, with greater accuracy, the forms that surrounded me, and to perceive the boundaries of the radiant roof of light which canopied me.” (Shelly pg.72). This shows that after a while of getting his senses in order he started to understand what was going on around him and it shows about the same level of intelligence as in the film if not slightly higher. Later he tells Victor of his ability to read. “As I read, however, I applied much personality to my own feelings and condition.”(Shelly 91)
This quote is from the monster it shows how he can read and learn like the rest of us it humanizes him in the eyes of the reader and shows how he has a brain and feelings and the ability to comprehend what is going on around him at any given moment in the movie there is no humanization of the monster that he is simply a monster and that is all he kills with no reason and has no desire but to kill and hurt when the beast in the book just wanted to belong somewhere anywhere because all he had been met with was violence. By the end of the book the monster dies which is the same as in the movie. The two pieces of media are just simply too different there are missing characters and a preface and no explanation of the integral plot points and everything in the film seems to be done for no reason or the reason it is done has been changed. In conclusion, the film and the book are simply too different to not be considered their own separate works due to the lack of character explanations and backstory to the plot they should be considered different works.
What has made me speak less with each passing day? I watch the dragonfly escape the lizard by inches and I decide to stay. I want my words and my life to escape death. So every time I try exaggerating my empathy , the insouciance, and the ability to extract only the bad side of my words and my life makes me edge closer to silence. I do not want to throttle my words to death.
What has made me speak less with each passing day? I watch the dragonfly escape the lizard by inches and I decide to stay. I want my words and my life to escape death. So every time I try exaggerating my empathy , the insouciance, and the ability to extract only the bad side of my words and my life makes me edge closer to silence. I do not want to throttle my words to death.
My first video essay. I talk about the film “A Ghost Story” and how it uses things like aspect ratio and literal temporal editing to get across tone.
Would really appreciate any likes/comments/subscriptions at this point. Let me know what you all think!
Exam Season
I have my last exam on the 17th and studying for it is draining me, but i gotta do what i gotta do. If i don't study i'll be more stressed in the exam, the discomfort now is worth the security later.
It's me ya boi
Anyway can we talk about how many parallels there are towards death and the strong themes of cheating death present in the DA games?
DAO: Cousland cheats death the first time by escaping their castle or whatever. Don't remember the other back stories but I know they also evade consequences or death. THEN you evade death AGAIN when you become a Warden. Then once more at the betrayal, when you get saved by Morgan and Flemeth. Then if you complete the dark ritual you manage to slay and survive the Archdemon. THE PROBLEM WITH THIS IS the entire point of being a Warden is to die. To slay dark spawns until you get killed or go insane -in which case you die anyway- Your whole premise is to be an honorable sacrifice, to die and take as many dark spawn as you can with you so that no one else has to. By surviving over and over again you're not only forsaking your purpose but spiting the wardens that came before you. How dare YOU be the one to survive? How dare you cheat your death over and over and over again? What about you makes you so special? More important than the other wardens? How fucking dare you?
Da2: So first Hawke survives the hordes of dark spawn in Fereldan, they survive the ogre attack in place of their sibling, then the trip to Kirkwall and then the entry into Kirkwall. How many died during those events, how many different times did Hawke cheat death in those instances? Hundreds of times, definitely. One wrong move and Hawke would've been killed, but they weren't. How lucky. Then in the deep roads, Hawke can lose their OTHER sibling to the taint. Then they lose their mother. What was all that surviving for if they were just going to lose all of their family, be left in this world without the people Hawke had worked so hard to save and to care for? Champion of Kirkwall, what a heavy title to bear with all the deaths of people Hawke couldn't save. They cheat death once more at the end, against Meredith.
DAI: Inky is sent to the chantry, and it blows up. You should've died but you didn't, instead you're given a key to close the rift and a woman saves you. Then you are found, imprisoned for terrorism. You should've been executed, good thing you have that key. Good thing you were the one to try and save Justinia, right? Good thing it was you who survived and not the thousands of others. Then comes the reinstitution of the Inquisition, a portion of the chantry long since dead -for good reason- that rises up from the ashes with you. Then in that one mission you get sent forward in time, in which everyone dies for you to get you to fix the disastrous consequences of you NOT defeating Corypheus. There are more moments but fast forwarding to the dragon secret and defeating Corypheus. You should not have been able to get that secret, but you did, the same way that key imbedded in your hand/arm. By all means, you were always meant to be dead. There was nothing special about Inky, there was no reason they should have survived any of what happened to them but they did. And that can be viewed as either happy, bittersweet, or outright tragic. Then, at the very end, the one thing that made you special, the key, has to be CUT OFF because it is killing you. You should have died but good thing Solas is there to take your arm, to help you cheat death again -which is a great parallel to how he helped you in the very beginning-
I stand by the idea that Dragon Age is a tragedy. The MC, whether that's Warden, or Hawke, or Inky has to give up EVERYTHING, their families, their lives, everything, to be forced into positions of power and save the world. And whether their willing or not, it doesn't matter because they will be forced into that position. Forced to be Hero of Fereldan, Champion of Kirkwall, or Inquisitor. You will be robbed of everything and forged into what people need you to be. That's the consequence of cheating death and being at the right place at the right time. But it's a good thing youre special, huh?
And you know the thing about being a Main Character is that you will cheat death over and over and over again, and the only consequence is that someone is going to be there to take your place, someone is going to die for you, eventually. There's nothing you can do about it except watch your life be taken away from you and watch all the people you love and care for die.
Now, notice how I said "chivalry" and not "pervet", because I actually quite enjoy his morals, but i fucking loathe his gags with the nose blood and all. This perverted size I do my best to ignore and at the very least tolerate, because I honestly believe Sanji's good character traits surpass this goddamn bad bits.
(This is going to be a long long essay, because I’ve been thinking about that Black Maria fight again and I wanted to give my two cents to his character development in detriment of my calculus exam tomorrow which I haven’t studied one bit. Also there’s going to be no images because I don’t fucking know how Tumblr works I’m new)
So, about his chivalry and the whole "won't hit a woman thing".
At first, I was very pissed about it. If it was in any other piece of media, not hitting a woman (as much as its a double standart) it's not exactly bad per se. It's not something I would applaud but rather think it's a failed flex of the writers to show themselves Oh So Manly and So Full of Outdated Morals. Regardless, not all that much of a bother. In real life, not hitting a woman is a thing and its not a bad one, since not every woman is able to GG combo a 6 foot tall jerk. And depending on how close your fictional world is to real life, this chivalry becomes more and more justified.
But One Piece is not your everyday fantastical fictional world. It's a whole ass big planet that keeps on moving with its own rules, physics and culture. A world a lot bigger than our own that expends to metaphysical standards. In One Piece, even if regular woman are shown to be a tad weaker than most regular man, its not by a lot when these randoms could die to an actual strong character to the same swing of a sword.
However, when Oda shows strong, powerful characters, they are so regardless of their gender. And One Piece has some STRONG female characters. I mean painfully strong. In a planet so big as theirs, its not a surprise woman has taken some Big Girl Pills. I don’t think it's up to discussion that woman can be seen as deadly powerful in this world as man.
But as refreshing as it is, this gender roles in One Piece come crumbling down once you add this chivalry shit.
Because when you have big women villains that can eat a whole island in two seconds, or women that can murder a whole army with one move, having a character refusing to fight feels demeaning. It’s like you are underestimating these powerful lads that can literally kill your nakama. What, you don’t think they can actually do damage to you, you fucking prick?
And it’s contradictory, to show these woman so strong and yet be seen so weakly by characters you were supposed to like. It feels demeaning to them, and it feels demeaning to you, a 12yo that was starting to really like see these woman achieving so many big things.
And Sanji is one of those characters you were supposed to like. Because he’s funny, strong, kind, a good cook, a good friend, a person you would love to know in real life. But still, he has this flaws that ick you so fucking much, flaws that get more and more evident as the story progresses.
Don’t get me wrong, I love OP, I have a tattoo of One Piece, Sanji is one of my favorite characters. However, I stopped reading for a while before WCI because, even though the story is amazing, I was getting really bothered with this whole woman situation. At some point, a trait that was exclusively Sanji’s that I was willing to ignore seemed to take this whole world by storm
Because the story portrays Sanji as dumb for not fighting woman, but at the same time, quite noble. And it pissed me off so much it took me four years to read One Piece again. Mainly because I wanted to catch the Wano arc finished, but also because I was so done that I could only pray this sexism situation got better over time and it was only a weird phase of Oda.
AND OH BOY HOW IT WAS
Recently reading WCI, I remembered everything I loved about Sanji, why I enjoyed his smile and his brains so much, and why he was one of my favorite characters ever. It wasn’t just uneducated 12yo me that was overlooking issues, Sanji is genuiely a good guy. Believe me, I’m 20, a woman in STEM that deals with sexism every single day, I’m plenty educated now.
Speaking of which, this is already very long and I really should study for that calculus exam but now I’m getting heated up.
Because WCI touches and highlights the best parts of Sanji, and fuck you if you disagree (... /j)
It called for my attention how Oda kept talking and hitting themes surrounding “humanity” in Whole Cake Island, and finally some things fell in place for me.
This chivalry of Sanji is a character trait, that even if annoying sometimes, is still a character trait meant to be seen perhaps as a flaw, but also as a product of his humanity and kindness.
Because the world in One Piece doesn’t think the same way as Sanji. Luffy would kick a woman, he won’t give a single damn fuck, and we are supposed to like Luffy plenty! Even if Oda has his lows in how he deals with the perception of woman in One Piece, this double standard morality is exclusively a Sanji thing.
Not only is a Sanji thing, but also a Zeff thing.
That scene particularly stuck with me, where Zeff says that if Sanji would ever hit a woman, he would kick Sanji’s ass and then kill himself. When Sanji asked why on his good mind would he do that, Zeff responds “It’s the price a parent has to pay. Don’t become something I hate.”
And oh, OH, what a line. Because after hearing from his biological father he would be embarassed if the world ever discovered a failure was his son, it must have meant a lot for Sanji to hear Black Leg Zeff (the best person he has ever encountered besides maybe his mother) declaring so proudly he was Sanji’s parent.
It gives not only a reason for Sanji be one of the only characters with this mentality, but also justify why he is so strongly convict with this morality. He doesn’t want to be a failure again. Not to Zeff. And he doesn’t want to live in a world where he’s too ashamed to look his father in the eye.
And, in a vacuum, this scene must have felt like a cheap excuse of Oda to not change the character. But combining with the whole Whole Cake Island (ha, whole whole), this shows exactly what type of person Sanji is.
Because, as I said before, his chivalry is a product of his kindness and humanity (such a thing his brothers doesn’t have), but also is a mark Zeff left for him. Screaming without actually screaming that Vinsmoke Judge is not Sanji’s real father, because his actual dad made sure to raise well. To make him become a good person by his own ideals. Sanji has Zeff’s ideals because Zeff is his dad, and in result, everything about Sanji is a direct contrast of his biological siblings.
Also, uniting everything together, knowing damn well where his chivalry came from, it’s safe to assume that if Sanji ever loses that sense of morality, it would be a big bad thing. As in bad, bad thing.
Rather we like it or not, his morality is strong and tied directly with his humanity. If Sanji ever hits a woman, if he loses this sense of right and wrong, it means we lost Sanji as we knew him - a kind hearted boy, a strong chef, a strawhat that would die for his friends.
So in Wano, when this “happens”, it feels like Oda warning us.
If Sanji ever hits a woman, you all better be shock in terror.
I don’t know if I misjudged Oda when I was 16, or if he was indeed telling a bad story before realizing and fixing it, but Wano feels like a redemption arc. Because above all that, we also have good LGBTQ representation that felt almost surreal, and one of the best One Piece arcs ever told in terms of story, but also, good Sanji moments, reminding us all of the person he is and who he became after WCI.
And for those who says this means Sanji won’t get character development ever, I present to you: Black Maria incident.
I see a lot of people disliking strongly how Sanji screamed for Robin’s help. But to me, it felt amazing to see Sanji actually trusting his friends. Because he won’t hit a woman, but he doesn’t need to die because of that. He has plenty of strong friends that can watch his back and do what he can’t do while he does what they can’t.
Not only that, but him screaming for Robin specifically shows that he acknowledges the women on his crew are strong. Strong enough to fight for him, strong enough to handle themselves. And also shows how he trusts them. Trusts that they won’t die, trusts their power, trusts that he won’t need to save them because it’s his time to be saved.
Not to mention the whole sacrificing thing he has going on, but that one was plently adressed on WCI.
And you have all the right to dislike this character trait as long as you realize it’s, you know, a character trait. And one that holds a lot of simbolism. I eventually came to enjoy the weight this chivalry holds, but it’s up to you.
That’s it. Thanks for reading. I’ll definitely go study for that calculus exam now
Leukemia in children presents a formidable challenge, demanding meticulous management and treatment. This detailed discussion aims to devolve into various facets of childhood leukemia, encompassing its definition, types, causes, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment modalities, potential complications, preventive measures, and strategies for supporting a child living with leukemia.
Leukemia is a hematological malignancy affecting the blood and bone marrow. Its prominence in childhood stems from the rapid proliferation of abnormal blood cells, disrupting the delicate balance within the body.
Understanding the roles of
Red blood cells (erythrocytes),
2.platelets (thrombocytes), and
3.white blood cells (leukocytes)
Is fundamental. An imbalance in these cells results in a spectrum of symptoms, from anemia to increased infection susceptibility.
. Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL): Predominant in children.
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML): The second most common type.
Hybrid or Mixed Lineage Leukemia: A rare amalgamation of ALL and AML.
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML): Uncommon in children.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Extremely rare in pediatric cases.
Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML): A rare type with unique growth characteristics.
The exact etiology of childhood leukemia remains elusive. Genetic mutations in bone marrow cell genes may occur sporadically or, in some instances, be inherited.
Exposure to Radiation.
Particularly high levels.
Inherited Syndromes.
Down syndrome.
Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Immune System Conditions.
Inherited disorders affecting immune function.
Family History.
Having a sibling with leukemia elevates the risk.
A diverse array of symptoms underscores leukemia’s impact on children, including;
.Pale skin
. Fatigue
.Dizziness
.Headaches
.Shortness of breath
.Frequent infections
.Fever
. Easy bruising
.Bleeding
.Bone or Joint pain, and
.Abdominal swelling.
.Blood Tests (Complete Blood Count — CBC): Essential for initial assessment.
Bone Marrow Aspiration or Biopsy: Crucial in detecting leukemia cells.
Lab Tests: Precisely determine leukemia type.
Diagnostic Imaging: X-rays, ultrasound,
lymph node biopsy, and
Lumbar puncture offer a comprehensive diagnostic perspective.
Unlike other cancers, leukemia is not staged but rather classified into groups, subtypes, or both based on type and specific characteristics, aiding in targeted treatment approaches.
Blood Transfusions: Address low blood counts, bleeding, or infections.
Chemotherapy: The mainstay, killing or inhibiting cancer cells.
Radiation Therapy: High-energy X-rays to target and eradicate cancer cells.
Stem Cell Transplant: Involves high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell replacement.
Targeted Therapy: Specific medications tailored to combat certain types of leukemia.
Immunotherapy: Enhances the body’s immune system to combat cancer cells.
Serious Infections: Resulting from compromised immune function.
Severe Bleeding: A consequence of low platelet levels.
Thickened Blood: Accumulation of leukemia cells in the bloodstream.
Leukemia Recurrence: A persistent concern.
Development of Other Cancers: A potential consequence of treatment.
Heart and Lung Problems: Arising from the impact of leukemia or its treatment.
Learning Issues and Growth Delays: Impacts on cognitive development and physical growth.
Fertility Problems and Bone Issues: Osteoporosis as a potential long-term complication.
Preventing childhood leukemia remains challenging, with a focus on caution regarding unnecessary exposure to radiation, especially in diagnostic procedures involving pregnant women and children.
Regular visits to oncologists and healthcare providers are crucial for monitoring and addressing emerging issues.
Managing eating difficulties and encouraging appropriate exercise play a vital role in supporting overall health.
Seeking counseling or participating in support groups helps both the child and their family navigate the emotional challenges associated with leukemia.
Attending all scheduled appointments ensures continuous monitoring and timely intervention if complications arise.
Prompt communication with healthcare providers is essential if the child experiences fever, worsening symptoms, new symptoms, or side effects from treatment.
Leukemia necessitates a comprehensive approach, involving diagnosis, tailored treatment, and ongoing monitoring.
Varied symptoms demand timely medical attention for an optimal prognosis.
Treatment modalities, including chemotherapy and stem cell transplant, are tailored to the specific leukemia type.
Complications, both short-term and long-term, underscore the importance of ongoing follow-up care.
Prevention is limited, with a focus on minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure.
Comprehensive support, encompassing medical, emotional, and lifestyle aspects, is essential for the child’s well-being.
Continued regular check-ups and imaging tests remain integral to post-treatment monitoring.
Maintaining open and transparent communication with healthcare providers ensures timely intervention if issues arise.
Inquiring about ongoing clinical trials or new treatments enables families to stay informed about emerging possibilities.
Childhood leukemia mandates a collaborative effort from medical professionals, caregivers, and support networks to optimize outcomes and enhance the quality of life for affected children. As the landscape of pediatric oncology evolves, the commitment to advancing treatment options and minimizing the impact of complications remains paramount, offering hope for a brighter future for children navigating the complexities of leukemia.
Medical students encounter significant academic challenges during their studies, balancing coursework, clinical rotations, research, and personal commitments. Expert Academic Assignment Help offers tailored assistance to meet their needs, providing study materials, tutoring, assignment help, and exam preparation. Beyond academics, it fosters a supportive environment for mentorship and guidance. In essence, Expert Academic Assignment Help is a valuable resource for medical students, empowering them to excel academically and develop into competent healthcare professionals. Contact us at expertassignment46@gmail.com for professional assistance
Writing a rhetorical analysis essay can be a challenging yet highly rewarding task. It requires a deep and thorough examination of how authors use rhetoric to convey their messages and persuade their audiences. Whether you are a student looking to enhance your essay writing skills or someone seeking professional assistance, this comprehensive guide will provide you with the tips and tricks needed to craft a compelling rhetorical analysis essay.
Before getting into the writing process, it is crucial to fully understand the purpose of a rhetorical analysis essay. Unlike a summary or a simple critique, a rhetorical analysis focuses on how the author uses language to influence the audience. This includes examining the use of ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion), and logos (logic). By understanding these elements, you can better appreciate the author’s techniques and their effectiveness.
A rhetorical analysis essay goes beyond merely discussing what the author is saying; it analyzes the techniques used to communicate the message and their impact on the audience. Understanding the purpose of the essay sets the foundation for a detailed and insightful analysis.
An effective rhetorical analysis essay begins with a well-organized outline. A clear outline will guide you through the writing process and ensure that you include all necessary components. Here’s a basic structure for a rhetorical analysis essay outline:
Introduction
Hook: Start with an engaging opening sentence to grab the reader’s attention.
Background Information: Provide context about the text you are analyzing.
Thesis Statement: Present your main argument or the purpose of your analysis.
Body Paragraphs
Ethos: Discuss how the author establishes credibility. Provide examples and analyze their effectiveness.
Pathos: Examine how the author appeals to the audience’s emotions. Use specific instances from the text to support your points.
Logos: Analyze the logical arguments and evidence presented by the author. Evaluate their validity and impact.
Conclusion
Restate your thesis in a new light based on the analysis conducted.
Summarize key points discussed in the body paragraphs.
Provide a final thought or call to action, emphasizing the importance of your analysis.
The introduction sets the stage for your analysis. Begin with a compelling hook to grab your reader’s attention. This could be an intriguing quote, a startling statistic, or a thought-provoking question related to the text you are analyzing. The goal is to pique the reader’s interest and encourage them to continue reading.
Next, provide some background information about the text. This includes the title, author, publication date, and any relevant historical or cultural context. This information helps the reader understand the context of the rhetorical strategies you will analyze.
Finally, present your thesis statement. This should be a clear and concise statement that outlines your main argument or the purpose of your analysis. Your thesis should indicate the rhetorical strategies you will discuss and their overall effectiveness in conveying the author’s message.
The body paragraphs are the heart of your rhetorical analysis essay. Each paragraph should focus on a specific rhetorical strategy and provide detailed examples from the text to support your analysis.
Ethos: Ethos refers to the credibility of the author. Discuss how the author establishes their credibility and authority on the subject matter. This could include their qualifications, experience, or the use of reputable sources. Analyze how the author’s credibility impacts the audience’s perception and trust in the message.
Pathos: Pathos appeals to the audience’s emotions. Examine how the author uses emotional appeals to connect with the audience. This could include vivid descriptions, personal anecdotes, or evocative language. Analyze specific instances where the author evokes emotions such as sympathy, anger, or joy, and discuss their effectiveness in persuading the audience.
Logos: Logos refers to logical arguments and evidence. Analyze how the author uses logical reasoning and factual evidence to support their arguments. This could include statistics, logical deductions, or empirical evidence. Evaluate the strength and validity of the logical appeals and their role in reinforcing the author’s message.
Each body paragraph should follow a clear structure: start with a topic sentence that introduces the rhetorical strategy, provide specific examples from the text, analyze the effectiveness of these examples, and connect them back to your thesis.
The conclusion should provide a concise summary of your analysis. Restate your thesis in a new light based on the analysis conducted in the body paragraphs. Summarize the key points discussed, highlighting the most significant rhetorical strategies and their impact on the audience.
Finally, provide a final thought or call to action. This could be a reflection on the broader implications of your analysis, a suggestion for future research, or a statement about the overall importance of understanding rhetorical strategies. Your conclusion should leave a lasting impression on the reader and emphasize the significance of your analysis.
If you’re struggling to get started, using an essay typer can be a helpful tool. An essay typer can generate essay examples based on the topic you provide. While you should not copy the generated content verbatim, it can give you ideas and structure for your own writing. Use it as a brainstorming tool to develop your unique analysis.
Essay typers can help you overcome writer’s block by providing a starting point for your essay. They can suggest potential topics, provide examples of thesis statements, and outline possible structures for your analysis. However, it is important to critically evaluate and customize the generated content to ensure it aligns with your own insights and arguments.
Writing a rhetorical analysis essay can be daunting, especially if you’re unfamiliar with the nuances of rhetorical strategies. Fortunately, numerous online services offer essay writing help. But Expert Academic Assignment Help is Exceptional ,it can provide you with professional guidance, from developing your thesis to structuring your essay and refining your arguments. Don’t hesitate to seek help if you need it professional assistance can significantly improve the quality of your essay.
Expert Academic Assignment Help writing services can offer personalized feedback and suggestions to enhance your writing. They can help you refine your thesis, develop a coherent structure, and ensure your analysis is thorough and insightful. Additionally, they can provide editing and proofreading services to ensure your essay is polished and free of errors.
A compelling conclusion is essential to leave a lasting impression on your reader. Your conclusion should not merely restate the thesis but also synthesize the key points discussed in your essay. Highlight the significance of your analysis and suggest broader implications or future areas of study. If you find this challenging, consider seeking Expert Academic Assignment Help writing help to ensure your essay ends on a strong note.
A strong conclusion should provide a sense of closure and completeness. It should reinforce the main arguments presented in your essay and emphasize their importance. Consider discussing the broader impact of the author’s rhetorical strategies on the audience or the relevance of your analysis in a larger context. This will help underscore the significance of your work and leave a lasting impression on your reader.
Finally, always proofread and revise your essay. Look for grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, and inconsistencies in your analysis. It’s helpful to read your essay aloud to catch mistakes you might have missed during silent reading. Revising your essay ensures that your arguments are clear and that your writing is polished and professional.
Proofreading and revision are crucial steps in the writing process. They help you identify and correct errors, improve clarity and coherence, and enhance the overall quality of your essay. Consider seeking feedback from peers or using online editing tools to ensure your essay is free of errors and effectively communicates your analysis.
Analyze, Don’t Summarize: Focus on analyzing the rhetorical strategies rather than summarizing the content of the text. Your goal is to examine how the author uses language to achieve their purpose and persuade the audience, not to simply restate what the author says.
Use Quotes Sparingly: Include relevant quotes from the text to support your analysis, but ensure they are integrated seamlessly into your writing. Avoid overusing quotes and ensure that each quote is followed by your own analysis and interpretation.
Stay Objective: Maintain an objective tone and avoid letting your personal opinions overshadow the analysis. Focus on the author’s rhetorical strategies and their effectiveness, rather than expressing your own views on the topic.
Write Frequently: Just like any other skill, writing improves with practice. Regularly write and analyze different texts to own your rhetorical analysis skills. Practice will help you develop a keen eye for rhetorical strategies and improve your ability to articulate your analysis effectively.
Use Clear and Concise Language: Ensure your writing is clear and concise. Avoid unnecessary jargon or overly complex sentences. Your goal is to communicate your analysis effectively, so clarity is key.
Develop Your Analytical Skills: Improve your ability to identify and analyze rhetorical strategies by reading and analyzing a wide range of texts. This will help you develop a deeper understanding of how authors use rhetoric and improve your analytical skills.
Seek Feedback: Share your essay with peers or instructors to get feedback on your analysis. Constructive feedback can help you identify areas for improvement and refine your writing.
In conclusion, writing a rhetorical analysis essay involves a careful examination of how authors use rhetorical strategies to persuade their audience. By following a structured outline, seeking essay writing help online, and focusing on a strong conclusion, you can develop a compelling and insightful analysis. Remember, the key is to analyze, not summarize, and to back up your points with concrete examples from the text. Happy Excellent writing!
For any enquiries and professional assistance ,
Email:expertassignment46@gmail.com
Online examinations have emerged as a reliable method for evaluating students in today’s digital era. However, navigating through these virtual assessments can present challenges, particularly for individuals new to the format or struggling to adapt. Fortunately, online exam assignment assistance services like Expert Academic Assignment Help provide invaluable guidance to students, empowering them not only to approach examinations with confidence but also to excel in them. Let’s focuses into ten effective strategies recommended by assignment assistance experts to successfully ace online examinations.
Understanding the structure and format of the examination is paramount. By comprehending what to anticipate, students can better prepare their study approach and manage their time effectively during the examination.
Effective time management is imperative. Establishing a study schedule that encompasses dedicated time for reviewing course materials, practicing sample questions, and undertaking mock examinations ensures comprehensive preparation.
Exploit the varieties of online resources available to supplement learning. Websites, forums, and educational platforms offer a treasure trove of information, including study guides and interactive quizzes, augmenting students’ understanding of the examination material.
Practice breeds perfection. Allocating time each day to tackle examination questions under timed conditions not only enhances speed and accuracy but also diminishes anxiety by acquainting students with the examination interface.
Do not hesitate to seek clarification from instructors or peers when encountering difficulties or questions about the examination material. Engaging in discussions through online forums or study groups can enrich understanding and boost confidence.
Cultivating a conducive study environment by minimizing distractions is imperative. Identifying a tranquil, well-lit space and disabling electronic device notifications optimize concentration and information retention.
Striking a balance between study sessions and short breaks is crucial for sustaining focus and preventing burnout. Rejuvenating the mind with stretching and relaxation exercises ensures optimal performance.
Mastery of effective examination strategies can significantly enhance performance. Learning to prioritize questions, manage time efficiently, and utilize available resources enriches examination outcomes.
Thoroughly reviewing course materials in the days leading up to the examination reinforces comprehension and aids retention. Crafting summary notes and mnemonic devices facilitates the recall of key concepts and definitions.
On the day of the examination, maintaining composure and confidence is paramount. Trusting in one’s preparation, staying focused, and approaching each question methodically are important contributors to success.
In conclusion, mastering online examinations necessitates thorough preparation, consistent practice, and strategic thinking. By adhering to these ten strategies and availing themselves of support from online exam assignment assistance services like Expert Academic Assignment Help, students can elevate their performance, surmount challenges, and attain academic success. With dedication, perseverance, and the right support system in place, excelling in online examinations is entirely attainable.
The strategies for handling online exams is essential for achieving academic success in the digital era. If you’re aiming to enhance your performance and ensure success in your online examinations, don’t hesitate to reach out to Expert Academic Assignment. Connect with us via email: expertassignment46@gmail.com to explore how our specialized assistance can elevate your exam preparation and performance. Remember, seeking support when needed is a wise decision, particularly when it comes to excelling in challenging assessments like online exams.
In the realm of academia, pursuing advanced degrees such as a Master’s or a PhD involves rigorous research and scholarly endeavors. Central to this academic journey are the culminating projects — the Master’s thesis and the PhD dissertation. While often used interchangeably, these two academic works possess distinct characteristics that set them apart. In this comprehensive discussion, we will major into the differences between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis, exploring various aspects including the depth of research, original contribution to knowledge, duration and intensity of study, evaluation and defense process, as well as career implications and academic prestige.
One of the fundamental disparities between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis lies in the depth of research. A Master’s thesis typically explores a specific topic within a field of study, offering a comprehensive analysis but within a more confined framework. In contrast, a PhD dissertation delves into original research, contributing novel insights or advancing existing knowledge within the chosen discipline. The depth of investigation required for a dissertation is considerably greater, often involving extensive data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
Building upon the notion of originality, a PhD dissertation is expected to make a significant contribution to the body of knowledge within the respective field. It must demonstrate a unique perspective, innovative methodology, or novel findings that add value to the academic discourse. On the other hand, while a Master’s thesis also involves original research, its contribution may be more incremental or focused on synthesizing existing literature rather than forging new paths of inquiry.
Another factor that distinguishes a PhD dissertation from a Master’s thesis is the duration and intensity of study involved. Pursuing a PhD typically entails a more prolonged and immersive engagement with the research topic, spanning several years of dedicated study and inquiry. The process of conducting original research, analyzing data, and drafting a dissertation demands a substantial commitment of time and effort. In contrast, a Master’s thesis can often be completed within a shorter timeframe, typically ranging from one to two years, depending on the program’s requirements.
The evaluation and defense process also differ between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis. For a PhD dissertation, the candidate must present their research findings to a committee of faculty members or experts in the field. This oral defense involves a rigorous examination of the dissertation’s methodology, results, and conclusions, as well as the candidate’s ability to articulate and defend their research. In contrast, while some Master’s programs may require a thesis defense, the level of scrutiny and formality is often less intense compared to a PhD dissertation defense.
Furthermore, the completion of a PhD dissertation carries significant career implications and academic prestige. Attaining a PhD is often regarded as the highest level of academic achievement, opening doors to advanced research positions, teaching opportunities, and leadership roles within academia and industry. A PhD dissertation serves as a hallmark of expertise and scholarly rigor, signaling to the academic community and potential employers the candidate’s ability to conduct independent research at a high level. On the other hand, while a Master’s thesis is a commendable accomplishment in its own right, it may not carry the same weight in terms of career advancement or academic recognition as a PhD dissertation.
In conclusion, the comparison between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis reveals the intricate differences that exist between these two academic endeavors. While both represent significant milestones in academic scholarship, they embody distinct attributes that reflect the depth of research, originality of contribution, and level of academic achievement. Whether seeking thesis vs. dissertation writing help or PhD dissertation assistance, students embarking on these scholarly endeavors can benefit from the guidance and support offered by dissertation writing services. With expert assistance, aspiring scholars can navigate the complexities of research, writing, and presentation, ensuring their academic work meets the highest standards of excellence and scholarly rigor
Understanding the differences between a PhD dissertation and a Master’s thesis is crucial for students embarking on academic research. Expert Academic Assignment Help offers personalized support at every stage of the process, ensuring academic excellence. Reach out at expertassignment46@gmail.com to benefit from expertise and guidance in navigating the complexities of research, writing, and presentation.
Crafting high-quality assignments is a fundamental aspect of academic success, requiring a strategic approach and attention to detail. Let’s involve into a detailed discussion on each of the provided guidelines for improving assignment writing skills:
The assignment prompt serves as a roadmap for your task, outlining the expectations and requirements set by your instructor. Without a clear understanding of the prompt, you risk deviating from the intended focus and missing key elements necessary for a successful assignment. To ensure comprehension, it’s essential to break down the prompt into manageable components, identify keywords, and clarify any uncertainties with your instructor. By mastering this step, you lay a solid foundation for the rest of your assignment.
Research is the backbone of academic writing, providing the necessary evidence and context to support your arguments. However, effective research goes beyond a simple gathering of information; it involves critical evaluation and synthesis of diverse sources to construct a coherent narrative. By consulting a variety of reputable sources, such as academic journals, books, and credible websites, you can deepen your understanding of the topic and bolster the credibility of your arguments. Additionally, employing advanced search strategies, such as Boolean operators and database filters, can streamline the research process and yield more targeted results.
The thesis statement serves as the central claim or argument of your assignment, guiding the direction of your analysis and providing a roadmap for your readers. A strong thesis statement is concise, specific, and debatable, offering a clear stance on the topic while leaving room for exploration and interpretation. To craft an effective thesis statement, it’s crucial to conduct preliminary research, identify key themes or patterns, and articulate a focused argument that aligns with the scope of your assignment. By establishing a solid thesis statement early on, you can maintain clarity and coherence throughout your writing process.
An outline is a roadmap that organizes your ideas and structures your assignment in a logical sequence. By outlining the main points, arguments, and supporting evidence, you can ensure that your assignment flows cohesively and addresses all necessary components. Additionally, an outline provides a visual representation of your assignment’s structure, allowing you to identify gaps in your argumentation or areas that require further development. To create an effective outline, consider using a hierarchical format, such as Roman numerals or bullet points, to delineate the main sections and subtopics of your assignment. By investing time in outlining, you can streamline the writing process and produce a more polished final product.
Formatting guidelines dictate the presentation and organization of your assignment, ensuring consistency and professionalism across academic work. While formatting requirements may vary depending on the discipline or institution, common elements include font size, margins, spacing, and citation style. By familiarizing yourself with the specific formatting guidelines provided by your instructor or institution, you can avoid unnecessary errors and present your work in a standardized format. Additionally, utilizing formatting tools or templates, such as Microsoft Word’s built-in styles or citation managers like EndNote, can simplify the formatting process and save time during document preparation.
Clarity is paramount in academic writing, as it enhances comprehension and facilitates effective communication of ideas. Clear and concise sentences convey information efficiently, minimizing ambiguity and maximizing impact. To achieve clarity, it’s essential to use precise language, avoid unnecessary jargon or complex syntax, and structure sentences logically. Additionally, incorporating transition words and phrases, such as “however,” “therefore,” and “in addition,” can enhance coherence and flow between ideas. By prioritizing clarity and conciseness in your writing, you can engage your readers more effectively and convey your arguments with precision.
Evidence serves as the backbone of persuasive writing, providing support for your claims and lending credibility to your arguments. Whether in the form of empirical data, scholarly research, or real-world examples, evidence should be relevant, reliable, and effectively integrated into your assignment. To effectively support your arguments with evidence, it’s essential to critically evaluate sources, consider alternative perspectives, and provide sufficient context for interpretation. Additionally, employing proper citation techniques, such as direct quotations or paraphrasing, ensures academic integrity and acknowledges the contributions of other scholars. By prioritizing evidence-based reasoning, you can strengthen the persuasiveness of your arguments and demonstrate your mastery of the subject matter.
Accurate citation of sources is essential for maintaining academic integrity and avoiding plagiarism. Proper citation acknowledges the contributions of other scholars, provides context for your arguments, and allows readers to locate the original source material. Depending on the citation style specified by your instructor or institution, you may be required to include in-text citations, footnotes, or a bibliography/reference list. To ensure proper source citation, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the conventions of your chosen citation style and apply them consistently throughout your assignment. Additionally, utilizing citation management tools, such as Zotero, Mendeley, can streamline the citation process and minimize errors.
Revision and editing are essential stages of the writing process, allowing you to refine your ideas, clarify your arguments, and improve the overall quality of your assignment. Revision involves reviewing your work from a macro perspective, focusing on content, structure, and argumentation, while editing focuses on micro-level elements such as grammar, punctuation, and style. To effectively revise and edit your assignment, it’s helpful to approach the task systematically, taking breaks between drafts to gain fresh perspective and utilizing feedback from peers, instructors, or writing tutors. Additionally, employing self-editing techniques, such as reading your work aloud or using grammar-checking software, can help identify errors and inconsistencies that may have been overlooked.
Proofreading is the final step before submission, ensuring that your assignment is free from errors and polished to perfection. While it may seem tedious, careful proofreading is essential for maintaining professionalism and credibility in academic writing. To effectively proofread your assignment, it’s helpful to approach the task methodically, focusing on one aspect at a time (e.g., spelling, grammar, punctuation) and utilizing tools such as spell-checkers or style guides for assistance. Additionally, seeking feedback from peers or mentors can provide valuable insights and help identify areas for improvement. By dedicating time and attention to proofreading, you can ensure that your assignment meets the highest standards of quality and excellence.
Incorporating these guidelines into your writing process can significantly enhance the quality of your assignments and contribute to your academic success. By prioritizing clarity, coherence, and evidence-based reasoning, you can effectively communicate your ideas, engage your readers, and achieve your academic goals. Additionally, seeking assistance from resources such as Expert Academic Assignment Help can provide valuable support and guidance, helping you navigate complex assignments and overcome challenges along the way. Remember, improvement takes time and effort, but with dedication and practice, you can elevate your assignment writing skills to new heights and achieve academic excellence.
Incase of need for any guidance or facing challenges during the study period, just email: expertassignment46@gmail.com
Pulmonary edema is a condition that results from the abnormal accumulation of fluid in the lungs, leading to impaired gas exchange and respiratory distress. This comprehensive discourse aims to provide an in-depth analysis of pulmonary edema, covering its pathophysiology, etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic modalities, treatment strategies, prevention strategies, and associated complications.
Pulmonary edema develops when there is an imbalance between the hydrostatic and oncotic pressures within the pulmonary vasculature. This imbalance leads to an increase in capillary permeability and the extravasation of fluid into the interstitial space and alveoli of the lungs. Several mechanisms contribute to this process, including increased capillary hydrostatic pressure due to heart failure, increased vascular permeability due to inflammation or injury, and decreased oncotic pressure due to hypoalbuminemia or capillary leak syndrome.
The etiology of pulmonary edema can be categorized into cardiogenic and noncardiogenic causes. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema occurs secondary to heart failure or other cardiac conditions that result in elevated left atrial pressure and pulmonary venous congestion. Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, on the other hand, is caused by factors unrelated to heart dysfunction, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), aspiration, sepsis, or neurogenic pulmonary edema.
The clinical presentation of pulmonary edema varies depending on the underlying cause and severity of the condition. Common symptoms include dyspnea, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, cough, frothy sputum, cyanosis, and crackles on auscultation. Severe cases may progress to respiratory failure, hypoxemia, and hemodynamic instability.
Diagnosing pulmonary edema requires a thorough clinical evaluation, including a detailed medical history, physical examination, and various diagnostic tests. Imaging studies such as chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan, and lung ultrasound can provide valuable information about lung parenchymal changes and the presence of pulmonary congestion. Laboratory tests, including arterial blood gas analysis, brain natriuretic peptide levels, and electrolyte measurements, may also aid in the diagnosis and assessment of disease severity.
The management of pulmonary edema involves addressing the underlying cause, relieving symptoms, and preventing complications. Initial treatment often includes supplemental oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and reduce respiratory distress. Diuretics, such as furosemide or bumetanide, are commonly used to reduce fluid overload and alleviate pulmonary congestion. In cases of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, vasodilators, inotropes, or mechanical ventilation may be necessary to improve cardiac function and gas exchange.
Preventing pulmonary edema requires a broad approach aimed at managing underlying risk factors and promoting healthy lifestyle habits. Patients with known cardiac conditions should adhere to prescribed medications, maintain a low-sodium diet, and monitor fluid intake to prevent fluid retention and exacerbation of heart failure. Individuals at risk of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema should avoid exposure to toxins, practice proper respiratory hygiene, and seek prompt medical attention for respiratory infections or injuries.
Untreated or inadequately managed pulmonary edema can lead to several complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, pulmonary hypertension, and death. Prompt recognition and intervention are essential to prevent progression to these life-threatening complications and improve patient outcomes.
Pulmonary edema is a complex and potentially life-threatening condition that requires prompt recognition, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate management. By understanding the underlying pathophysiology, etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic modalities, treatment strategies, prevention strategies, and associated complications of pulmonary edema, healthcare providers can optimize patient care and outcomes. Continued research efforts aimed at elucidating the mechanisms underlying pulmonary edema and identifying novel therapeutic targets are essential to further improve patient outcomes and reduce the global burden of this condition.
Embarking on your journey in the field of medicine is both exciting and challenging. As you navigate through your rigorous study period, it’s essential to seek guidance and assistance whenever needed to ensure your success.
At Expert Academic Assignment Help, we understand the demands of medical education and are here to support you every step of the way. Whether you require assistance with assignments, research papers, or exam preparation, our team of experts is dedicated to providing you with the help you need to excel in your studies.
Don’t hesitate to reach out to us for guidance, academic support, or any questions you may have. You can contact us via email at expertassignment46@gmail.com
Your thesis serves as the bedrock of your research paper, providing a central focus and guiding principle for your investigation. It’s imperative to construct your thesis around a clear and concise idea, premise, or claim that you intend to explore and defend throughout your paper. In the introduction, articulate precisely what your thesis aims to address, ensuring clarity and coherence from the start outlining the scope and significance of your thesis, you not only distinguish your paper from others but also establish a compelling rationale for your research. Moreover, show case to your readers the insights they stand to gain by engaging with your thesis, thereby enhancing the relevance and impact of your work.
Crafting a comprehensive outline is an indispensable organizational tool in the research paper writing process. It functions as a strategic roadmap, enlightening the structure and content of your paper while facilitating coherence and logical progression. While there is no one-size-fits-all approach to outlining, it is essential to consider several key elements:
Content and Presentation Style: Determine the thematic framework and narrative structure for each section of your paper, ensuring alignment with your thesis.
Supporting Arguments and Evidence: Incorporate pertinent supporting arguments and empirical evidence to substantiate your thesis and bolster your overrating argument.
Cohesion and Conclusion: Ensure that your outline fosters cohesion by integrating disparate ideas and perspectives, culminating in a definitive conclusion that reinforces the significance of your research.
By vividly crafting an outline that contains these elements, you can streamline the writing process and maintain a cohesive and compelling narrative throughout your paper.
Robust and thorough research is the cornerstone of a successful research paper, providing the empirical foundation and scholarly context necessary to substantiate your thesis. Begin by identifying a diverse array of potential sources that align with the theme focus and research objectives of your paper. With your outline serving as a strategic guide, embark on a systematic exploration of relevant literature, primary sources, and empirical data, prioritizing depth and breadth of coverage over superficiality. While evaluating sources, prioritize relevance and scholarly vigor over perfection, recognizing that the synthesis of diverse perspectives and methodologies can enrich your analysis and deepen the intellectual resonance of your paper.
Armed with a comprehensive outline and an extensive body of research, it is time to translate your insights and arguments into a cognitive and compelling thesis. Drawing upon the scaffolding provided by your outline, into details craft each section of your paper, maintaining specificity to your thesis statement and overrated argument. Whether elucidating theoretical frameworks, analyzing empirical data, or synthesizing disparate perspectives, strive for consistency and coherence in your writing, ensuring that each subsection contributes meaningfully to the specific narrative of your paper. By adhering to the theme contours mentioned in your outline and showing the resilience of your thesis, you can construct a persuasive and intellectually rigorous argument that resonates with your readers.
The editing and revision process is an indispensable stage in refining the coherence, clarity, and scholarly rigor of your research paper. Upon completing the initial draft of your paper, undertake a comprehensive review and analysis, focusing on several key areas:
Structural Coherence: Evaluate the organizational coherence and logical progression of your paper, identifying opportunities to streamline transitions and enhance narrative flow.
Clarity and Precision: Scrutinize the clarity and precision of your prose, refining language and syntax to elucidate complex ideas and facilitate reader comprehension.
Scholarly Rigor: Verify the accuracy and integrity of your citations, ensuring adherence to established conventions of academic citation and attribution.
Grammar and Mechanics: Attend to grammatical errors, typographical inconsistencies, and syntactical ambiguities, rectifying any lapses in mechanics that deter from the scholarly integrity of your paper.
By subjecting your paper to rigorous scrutiny and revision, you can elevate the quality and scholarly resonance of your research, enhancing its capacity to engage and persuade your audience.
As a culminating step, it is essential to create a comprehensive checklist to ensure that your research paper adheres to the highest standards of scholarly rigor and integrity. This checklist should encompass several key dimensions:
Content: Verify that your paper addresses all requisite components, including an introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusion.
Structure: Assess the structural coherence and narrative progression of your paper, ensuring that each section contributes meaningfully to the overarching argument.
Citation and Attribution: Confirm the accuracy and completeness of your citations, adhering to established conventions of academic citation and attribution.
Presentation: Review the formatting and presentation of your paper, attending to stylistic considerations such as font, spacing, and margins.
Proofreading: Conduct a final proofreading of your paper, scrutinizing for any lingering errors or oversights in grammar, syntax, or mechanics.
By rigorously adhering to this checklist, you can ensure that your research paper meets all necessary criteria for scholarly excellence and academic integrity, thereby maximizing its impact and credibility within the academic community.
By specifically following these six steps, you can consistently produce research papers of exceptional quality and academic rigor, irrespective of your current skill level or disciplinary background. Each step represents a critical juncture in the research paper writing process, providing a strategic framework for conceptualizing, organizing, and presenting your research in a compelling and intellectually rigorous manner. By embracing these principles and methodologies, you can elevate the caliber and excellent resonance of your research papers, thereby enhancing your academic proficiency and contributing meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge within your chosen field of study.
Crafting a top-notch research paper demands careful planning, thorough research, and diligent editing. Following the outlined steps can boost students’ writing skills and consistently lead to ‘A’ grades. Yet, academic writing complexities can overwhelm newcomers or those short on time.
Remember, seeking help isn’t weakness but a proactive strategy to ensure work quality. By utilizing available resources and seeking aid when necessary, students can ease academic writing stress and enrich their learning journey.
Therefore, I strongly encourage students to consider seeking assistance from Expert Academic Assignment Help by emailing expertassignment46@gmail.com With their expertise and support, students can receive tailored guidance, feedback, and assistance throughout the research paper writing process. By leveraging the expertise of academic professionals, students can overcome challenges, refine their writing skills, and achieve academic success more effectively.
I mean I just want the president to get nuked so sure
petition to have the apocalypse start right neow and the government falls (i have a essay due and i wish i was in new vegas universe instead)
"Weird one out"
— Forgetting one's true self to find friendship.
There's something so sad about being alone, for the sole reason that you were different. You just can't seem to fit in, you try to blend in, compete in competitions to be seen, butt into group discussions, and replacing your humor and true self to be seen, heard, and most importantly; to avoid being left out.
They laugh at you, of course as a joke. They think you're quirky, a bit out of place, and awkward. You're funny to them, you're finally seen, but as a joke. It's a bitter moment for you but that's okay, it really is. It's okay because they're friendly now, right? You're their friend now, you're a part of them, all you have to do is to be funny because that's what they want from you. You need to act on this comedic persona so you'll finally have friends, don't worry they'll eventually see who you truly are once they're comfortable with you.
Who the hell are you kidding? You're just a casual friend to them— no, you're just an acquaintance. Oh well, you'll find other groups to try and fit in, and then you did! The kids behind class are just as quirky as you so that means they'll understand, right? With the first few you weren't so lucky but this time is different. They're different, just like you.
You don't exactly fit their archetype of what is "quirky". Unfortunately you don't fit the aesthetic they were hoping for. Even to the smaller groups you don't fit in, because they've made up their minds on who and what they are as a person. They don't know the true you since you put up too many faces to hide what's beneath, you're weird not because you're you, but because you don't even know who you are anymore.
Everyone knows you differently, in the pursuit to find companionship you've created too many faces for only one body. Which one is your true face? Do you even know yourself anymore?
It's so lonely out here.
Trans Lugia (WIP)
The story of Lugia is very much tied into the story of their writer, Takeshi Shudô. He was saddened to see the direction they took with Lugia in the film, feeling Lugia was presented in a way too masculine for what he envisioned.
I find myself emotionally invested in Lugias fate, I want to recognize the her inherent...I want to understand the langauge, the words he spoke, as I understand poetry. I find myself wondering, relying on others for her form, her words...am I so helpless to be named man as well after so many years unattested, even if miserable? Did I not bring happiness? Is my childhood not forever a scar? It is too late for Takeshi to change things...at least how I see it. People have moved on. Discussion threads on Bulbapedia are already 12 years old, the links to the translations broken. All I have left is the original japanese blog posts from Takeshi Shudô.
If your reading this and your interested I have included the link. I'd appreciate any feedback on any of the posts, regardless on what they are about. Thanks for reading either way.
Takeshi's blog:
I FREAKING TURNED IN MY ESSAY RIGHT WHEN MY SONG STOPPED AREGGSVJHMSBKWJASNM
the song was Tchaikovsky's Symphony, No 4 in F minor. Op 36. TH 27. 4 Finale Allegro con fuoco (to be specific😋)
Villainification of Perfectly Reasonable Anger; A Queer Feminist's Rant.
I am so tired of the entire 'man hating' feminist narrative and everything surrounding it, honestly. Yes, I am angry, Kevin. And this anger is here to stay. I am angry because you are quite literally making me debate if I deserve human rights or not? If my gender deserves healthcare or not?
I was watching a video (Essayist: Contrapoints) today where the woman perfectly articulates the immense emotional disdain and burden felt by the person of minority when they are asked to sit and 'debate'/explain why they deserve the bare freaking minimum, why their existence is valid, to their 'oppressor'-- and it almost made me tear up, because I have been put into that position to explain/debate so so many times. Topics like abortion, equal pay, LGBTQ rights-- that I have had to discuss 'rationally' with people in my life, because they simply have differing 'opinions'. I could never put that terrible feeling into words.
My dear, you are putting people in the position where their entire existence is put to question and placed up for debate like a simple small political issue-- and then you ask them to not be angry? When they argue back, why is it an 'overly emotional' and 'irrational' response? Is their pain, sadness and fury not warranted? Is it really an overreaction, or simply the most natural fucking response?
Is feeling hurt and angry because people who I am surrounded with, live with, frequent places with, talk daily with, cannot-- forget accepting my identity--even wrap their head around it sometimes, that unreasonable? I would say.. it isn't. So my rage is here to stay. And whilst it won't be directed at you, it will stay until we have fixed this accursed state of society.
Or nevermind that.
Which brings me to my second point.
The Romanticisation of Cold Logic and Neutral Stance
Why have we started romanticizing 'neutral cold hard logic' or 'detached stance' so much? A person who remains emotionless in the argument is not the winner. They simply do not have enough leverage in the topics being discussed (especially in cases of gender issues).
You say 'let's discuss why women shouldn't be allowed body autonomy' and you expect me to be like 'oh dear Jared, of course, let's have a calm and collected "debate" about our body rights. Do you want a tea while we discuss this little measly political issue?'
Jared, the only reason you aren't loosing your shit right now is because this thing won't ever affect you the way it does the person opposite to you. So don't ask me to 'chill out'.
We are angry and it's fucking valid.
Peace.
The Ambiguous State Of Tevyat
Tevyat has its own laws in a lot many contexts, but do you ever wonder, does sexism and homophobia exist in the world of tevyat and so correlating to the world of Genshin Impact? Let me know your views.
I read about that confirmation from Arcane’s creators that homophobia and sexism does not simply exist in the universe of Arcane– and I think this is one of the reasons why the representation and the character writing (women’s especially) shines in arcane. There has already been enough praise about Arcane’s writing so I won’t get into it here.
But that made me think that Is that not the perfect setting to write endearing characters in? It eliminates a much more complicated aspect and leaves you with people as an empty blank slate– whose grievances will be based on class struggle, capitalism etc– sure. But it lets everyone be just… everyone. If that makes sense. Why I also relate to that method of storytelling is because (I promise it's about genshin, wait for it) I do end up writing my stories that way– at least a lot of my characters, who have mostly deconstructed most of their ingrained prejudices by the time the story starts, so I can focus on their struggle as related to the story then.
It also got me thinking about Genshin.
SEXISM in the world of Tevyat…
Does not exist. I believe and concur so. Gender-specific crimes have been implied (see Lynette’s story), but in the entirety of its socio political landscape, sexism does not exist in tevyat.
In a world where women harness powers greater than men a lot of times, rule nations and none bats an eye. Soldiers exist as soldiers, knights exist as knights– not women, not men. (My egalitarian perspective’s start to ideal world, really)
I think sexism not existing in the world of Genshin is just very obvious, by the nature of it being an anime-stylised gacha game as well.
HOMOPHOBIA in the world of Tevyat…
Is harder to discuss because even if homophobia does not exist in tevyat, it sure does exist in China. A lot.
But despite that fact, let’s discuss it. HYV has always massively queer-coded their games (go argue with the wall, this is an obvious fact). Even in the face of strict censorship laws, they haven’t really been afraid to confirm (gay) relationships in some other games (see Bronya-Seele from HI3 and Kiana-Mei from HI3). Genshin taps a wider audience thus shies away from direct mentions. But the amount of queer coding? It’s there. Even if you are not a shipper.
I think I would like to mention one of the more highly-implied stances of queer relationship–
See Yoimiya’s story quest 1. The two guy ‘best friends’ who we help make up and their yearning to watch the fireworks together.
Of course, this is all very ambiguous. But with so many characters being into the traveller (despite the gender dynamics) and despite which twin you chose–
For example, Shenhe’s implication that Xiao must have found someone special in a voiceline exists even if you chose Aether or Lumine. It makes me think and believe that homophobia also does not exist.
No wonder I love the game so much.
This might all be very obvious to some people here and I might just be over-explaining it, but this assumption of Tevyat being exempt from sexism and homophobia was only a subconscious one for me until recent times and I just wanted to hear everyone’s thoughts on it as well.
please do write an essay about wanderer one day i would love to read it <3
i love you. he is so <3 (essay under the cut because im crazy)
scara/wanderer/whatever you want to call him is so interesting to me because like. out of the train wreck that was inazuma, he managed to be one of the only well-written characters. and he wasn't even on the playable roster for that nation. incredible. why was inazuma so bad
in a way, his character actually functions to draw attention to a lot of the problems i personally have with the way ei/raiden and inazuma are written, namely that ei sucks and never sees a single consequence for her actions or even like. tries to fix her mistakes in any tangible way. Scaramouche was her prototype puppet, meant to be a test run for the eventual figurehead for inazuma which would run on unchangeable ideals while ei fucked off to her mind palace forever. he was not actually used for this purpose because ei saw him CRY and decided he wasn't fit to rule a country, and instead of like... idk doing anything RATIONAL with him she was just like ok. i'll let him sleep forever i guess. surely he will not wake up and resent me for this and turn evil. anyway. obviously he wakes up and realizes why mama ei abandoned him. he of course does not take this well. he internalizes the idea that his emotions made him weak and useless from. basically the moment of his conception. his emotional response is the reason he wass essentially abandoned by his mother. (to be fair, it's unclear if ei was aware that he retained consciousness, but still. throwing him out like trash because he had EMOTIONS was fucked up). this sets the stage for the way his mental state deteriorates over the course of the next couple hundred years.
so the poor kid has been abandoned by his mother for feeling things. bad start. but another important piece of this story is that, as per ei's original design for a puppet figurehead of inazuma, scara was essentially built to house her gnosis (essentially the heart of an archon.) since he never actually got used for that purpose, though, he feels as though he is missing a fundamental part of himself. as he wanders inazuma, he feels that lack of a heart harder and harder as he attempts to connect to humans and finds that he can't quite connect with them. (this is what i think of as his 'trying to be human' era) He struggles with the idea of mortality--specifically, a child that he befriends dies prematurely, and scara can't help but view it as a betrayal--"how could he break his promise and leave me behind?" he becomes acutely aware of the fact that he is not quite human and not quite god, but something in between--something that lacks the ability to feel like a human but was too emotional to fulfil its purpose as a god.
mortality and emotional response, to scara, become signs of weakness. he was discarded due to his emotionalness. his human friends' mortality took them from him. he grows to despise and reject both, which kickstarts his 'trying to be a god era,' which is how we've seen him in-game thus far. the thing is, he doesn't REALLY want to be a god. he wants to be loved. he wants validation and respect and family--everything that was taken away from him when ei threw him out, and when his human friends abandoned him. he tried it one way, tried playing pretend as a human, and only found more pain and suffering, so he decides to swing hard in the other direction, developing a superiority complex as a cover-up for his insane abandonment issues. No one can hurt a god. no one can abandon a god. no one can call a god weak. a god doesn't need friends or family or love because a god is all-powerful. he is convinced that if only he can attain true godhood--a gnosis, the item he was created to house, he will FINALLY be happy. and he decides that it doesn't matter how many people he has to hurt to do it.
(btw, throughout this entire time, ei has been in her mind palace being a deadbeat mom and deliberately ignoring the havoc her son is wreaking on the nation SHE IS SUPPOSED TO BE RUNNING. he even sends a message of introduction to the raiden shogun at some point ("tell her my name is kunikuzushi") which i can only assume was meant to make it back to ei and maybe get her to CARE A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE KID SHE BROKE but she either never recieved it because the raiden shogun sucks equally as hard as she does or she heard it and didn't care. ughhhh.)
anyway. obviously this little insane attempt at attaining godhood does not end well for scara. i cant rewatch that sumeru archon quest cutscene without losing all brain function but you know what i mean. he fucks up. his hubris is his downfall. his attempt to bury his emotions and his humanity in order to ascend to godhood give him far too much confidence, and he loses the battle. nahida takes the gnosis and then fucking immediately gives it back to dottore because she sucks. scara's final attempt at finding some sort of place for himself in the world fails spectacularly and leaves him mentally and physically destroyed.
and in 3.3 he is going to wake up and keep going. and i am so so so so excited. i want to know how he heals. I want to see him reconcile with his humanity and his emotions AND with his origins in godhood, and i think having nahida and the traveler help him do that is gonna be so good if they do it right. i LOVE that they're allowing him to still retain a lot of that selfishness and smugness and attitude that makes him compelling as a villain, while ALSO seemingly letting him reconnect with his humanity and become better. i do still hope he gets to beat the shit out of ei tho
We used to meet at dusk Sitting on the old bridge While fog surrounds the hills It covers the road past our sight
No one knows where we are Only the sky and the autumn leafs When you said "I love you" The miserable clouds disappeared
-Al Rahbani Brothers
I tell my neighbor: Come and spend the night with me, I have figs, and almonds, and sugar. We sing, because you are lonely, And singing will ease your longing. I have a home, and a small area of land, So I am safe now. The land of my country is land from heaven, And on it sleeps the painful time. I tell our house: If I am alone, And snow and cold blows, My house is as fire to me, And the winter passes, friendly as a field of roses.
-Al Rahbani Brothers
The failed echo will help me And the tyrannical secrets inspire me! Times of resounding anxiety And a storm hugs me tightly Here the cities of contradiction contain me The countryside of art precedes it I am drawn to the current by self-taught people My heart is steadfast in the war alone
And despite the hatred I prepare for the feverish blindness!
Sakina Al-Sharif
Have I given up on illusions? Heavy nights train me And the rain of melodies were epics I became aware of war after war The sound of the sword inspired and inspired me! I search my halls and call out To me, to me, O formulated dream
-Sakaina Al-sharif
Kabil şimdi şistten yapılmış bir kuşla atıyor Yeryüzüne iner ve onu muazzam ateş yağmurlarıyla yağdırır. Onun ıssızlığından önce kuleler ve evler çöküyor Ölüler toprağın kucağından yukarılara kaçar Cain şimdi tankında dolaşıyor Koyunlar dehşete kapıldı Kabil ahırının duvarını yıkıyor Köyde gece sabaha döndüğü için ahırı uyumaya uygun değil Aşağıya inen ışığın yaydığı Bir ejderhanın dili gibi Kasırga dünyanın yüzünü harap etti