This all has been on my mind for a while. Animals are fun to personify, but the moment you forget to that it's all for show is the moment you start make an ethical justification for poaching
"dolphins are completely evil" I actually don't think we should assign human morality to animals with no concept of law or civilisation with an intelligence roughly equating to that of a toddler
Season of the Commercials - Nostalgia Critic
Thank you @tommychecks and everyone who got me to 10 reblogs!
Scanlan Shorthalt, the gnomish bard, is an assumed identity. He's secretly been a tortle artificer monk multiclasser in disguise.
Once again, Lllliiiiliannn… the reason why we call it incest is because you insist that sibling enmeshment can be healthy, and positive, when anyone with any brand of search engine can learn that that is a lie. Why lie about a word's definition, Lily? Why try to tell people a relationship with no clear boundaries can work, Lily?
Lily won't stop doing weird incest art.
I don't know if this is still relevant, but I'm gonna say it; Chris Pratt is still a good actor, he's just in a point where he's become really sought-after and so he's been landed parts that kinda suck.
He was fine as Mario, even if it was a weird choice. And Garfield was obviously stunt-casting, but that's conversation and three quarters bigger than him. But that's the film that got people saying he has no range, and if you seriously believe that, then you haven't seen "The Terminal List".
Everyone said all the informative stuff I could've wanted I'm just sharing.
Hhheeeeeyyyy
happy Thursday the 20th
We're saved! We're saved! Sa-aved! Sa-ved! Sa-aved!
Had an idea today that I don't think I'll ever make it might be a fun occasion series.You know that youtube channel 'How it Should of Ended'? Web animated parodies that about exactly what it says on the tin? My idea is sort of the opposite of that. Movie parodies that deliberately respond to often critiqued or parodied movie scenes, plot points, or plot holes, showing how the story would be actually worse if they did exactly what we said they should have done.
For example, Glynda just tells Dorothy that the shoes can take her home the moment she gets them. She never actually learns that "there's no place like home" and then lives the rest of her life regretting coming back, wanting to return this fantastic world she didn't get to see, and ends up in a psychward after attempting to run into the next tornado to hit her farm.
Indiana Jones doesn't actually have to retrieve the Ark of the Covenant because it kills the Nazis after they try to use it? Alright, let's see the movie where he just sits around waiting for that to happen, then it does, and he brings it back to America without any issue. Marion's dead because they killed her for the medallion, but who cares? I got the magic god box.That sounds like a way better movie, right?
The fellowship takes the eagles to mordor. Not even a third of the way there, the ring corrupts the eagles, and they successfully destroy all the kingdoms. Because they're gods that we all mistook for a taxi service.
Give me enough time, I bet I could come up with a reason why fixing the ending of Grease would be actually way worse.